Notes on friendship as a co-adventure
Friends are for living life with, not just for talking about life with
I just spent a week in the middle of nowhere in the south of Spain at 'RichFest 2' (named after the organiser, Rich Bartlett), where about 20 people from the Internet gathered to enjoy each other's company away from the familiar patterns of everyday life. There was a moderate amount of techno, there were participant-led workshops and there was all the joy of co-living, namely cooking and cleaning.
I had a wonderful time meeting new people, putting faces to names from Twitter and deepening a couple of relationships from previous in-person gatherings. There were some exceptionally resonant conversations that I suspect can only happen when you get a critical mass of like-minded weirdos together for a while.
In the last couple of days, as the social fabric started to shift towards a comfortable green velvet paired with a neon pink silk, I noticed a feeling that was remarkable in its absence from my normal life. I had the feeling that I was co-living with people, and I don't mean in the 'living in a big house together' sense. It felt like the adventures of my life were happening with other people who were also living their own adventures with me.
This sense is different from how my relationships with most of my friends has drifted with age, with living in a big city and with habit. It struck me that most of the time when I meet with friends in person or online, one of the first questions is some version of "so what have you been up to?" It's like we're living separate lives that we then tell each other about, not sharing in the living itself.
While it's a genuine blessing to have friendships where we sincerely want to know how each other’s lives are unfolding, I realised that I also want more friends who I do life with rather than just talk about my life with. It seems that talking about my life takes me out of it somehow, putting me into a kind of reflective, evaluative mode that often makes my life feel less good than when I’m just living it.
And to my wonderful local friends who may be reading: this isn't meant as a criticism of how we are together. I'm hugely grateful for all the friendships in my life, especially those that a comfortable, long-standing, high-trust friend group provides. Just consider this an invitation for further deepening and co-adventuring, if you want it.
I noticed another version of this experience a few months ago when I visited Barcelona with my partner Cécile. We were there at the same time as Paul, Angie and their daughter, and because Paul is also a self-employed weirdo, I had this wonderful, yet unfamiliar experience of impromptu hanging out.
Here in London, where I’ve lived for pretty much my entire adult life, with friends who are increasingly busy professionals, it’s common—necessary even—to arrange catch-ups weeks in advance, and then to walk or take public transport 30-60 minutes to get there. It’s always a thing that requires planning, coordination and a non-trivial amount of effort.
By contrast, it was a strange shock to my system that I could just send Paul a message in the morning and arrange to meet for brunch a 15 minute amble away. Of course, it helps that Paul’s schedule was as flexible as mine (he is the “Pathless Path” guy, after all), but it’s still striking how so much big city professional life makes these kinds of casual, low-key interactions less accessible.
The lesson I’m taking away from this is that there are forces in my current context that conspire to nudge me towards this strange kind of pseudo-isolation, a kind of loneliness that I was only able to notice by meeting a need I didn’t even know I had. Pushing back against these nudges requires some level of intentionality and environment design.
Here in London, I can be on the lookout for more events that might interest my friends and take more initiative in inviting people join me. Live music, the theatre or interesting talks all come to mind. Longer term, I can also decide to choose where I live based on proximity to friends, at least to the extent I have the resources and flexibility to do that.
In the online context, one of the best examples I’ve come across for cultivating this co-adventuring vibe is the use of personal feeds in Cosy Web style non-public online spaces, like a Discord server or Slack group.
My friend Tasshin has written an excellent article on how feeds work, but in short, imagine an invite-only common-interest community where each member gets their own channel (#feed-michael) to write about whatever is alive for them. Other members can hang out in other people’s feeds, reply, give emoji reacts (a truly overpowered social technology) and so on, which means everyone can be in the loop with what’s going on in real time and also feel seen by others—all without the need for ‘catch ups’.
I’m in a few such communities, but I’ve been giving more thought to how I might create some Cosy Web instances of my own. My Alexander Technique course is hosted on a non-public platform with community features, but it feels far too big to qualify, unless I create smaller sub-channels. I’m keeping my awareness open to any common-interests around which I might like to cohere say 30 engaged people, but for now it’s a quiet background aspiration.
If any of this has resonated with you, I’d suggest a couple of things.
The first is to look at your local, ‘physical’ friendships and see where you can make a shift from telling friends about your life to living your life with your friends. If your primary way of being with friends is, for example, regular catch-up-flavoured drinks or dinners, are there events or activities that you could enjoy together?
The second is to look at your online life and consider if you have friends who might be interested in creating a small, non-public Discord community where you can implement this feed model. Even a small-scale online co-working community could scratch a social itch you don’t even know you have.
And I’d love to hear how you get on, if you do decide to explore this further.
Wow TIL "cozy web." So apt.
I keep thinking about this notion of living with your friends instead of feeding each other updates every six months. This is especially alive for me right now as I am back in the Bay Area catching up with friends. Most of my friends are people I worked with or lived with—we did life together intensely at one point to form a strong bond, but now our lives have grown in wildly different directions. Often in these catchups I feel like I have to remember my former self and try to be that person in one way so there's a thread of continuity, but that feels like wearing too-small shoes.
Jesse's solution to this was that last year he rented a big house in Mexico for a month and invited everyone he knows (https://hinterlander.substack.com/p/an-invitation) to stop by for some time, and I'm hoping to make that an annual tradition. That sort of thing won't work for everyone, but for those who do make the trek I imagine it renews the bonds quite a bit.
Anyway, you and Cécile are invited to Mexico next winter :)
I love that you are thinking about this too. It has been on my mind very much the last month or two in a personal friend demographic sense (how do I cultivate friendships that allow a more "co-living" connection), and longer than that in a "can I create an actual community living situation for my friends and family?" sense. I was largely inspired by the Supernuclear blog on Substack, which is mostly about full-on "co-living" (as in forms of cohabitating), but touches on more broad and flexible forms of co-living as well.
I think you've articulated several things very well here, particularly the frame of "talking about our lives" vs. "living them together". Unfortunately I think it's our culture that is broadly stacked against co-living in general, from the prioritization of work and the commonality of "9-5" schedules, to the primacy of the "nuclear family" (especially in the US, but AFAIK in many European countries too in this century). So it's up to us to find ways to prioritize co-living in our lives and with our friends (and family!). Hopefully with more and more people doing this, the sharing of ideas and experiences will help inspire and support ever more to do so.
Personally I'm a little skeptical of the "cozy web", particularly as far as Discord is concerned. Probably this is in good part due to the habits and preferences of my primary, local friend group, the vast majority of which have never used Discord, and for many of whom (myself included) chat-style interactions can be overwhelming and feel demanding rather than "cozy". Ironically I actually feel like Facebook at a certain stage, maybe 10-15 years ago, was a pretty great balance of broad and cozy. Before it got invaded by too many ads, company posts in general, feed "suggestions", etc, etc., it was a feed largely composed of updates on life from my friends, and I loved that. Now much of that is scattered to Instagram, with so many people (inexplicably to me) using Stories to share their life, which is ephemeral. If you're not there to see their story before it expires, it's gone! I don't get that practice... Anyway, I digress. My solution to this is actually to create a psuedo-Facebook on my own and try to get all my friends over to it. I like the central feed view that each person can have (which Discord lacks), the better capability for photo galleries (a common share on social media, e.g. kids, vacation, etc.), and all that. I'm likely going to use BuddyBoss and self-host, having looked at Friendica and Diaspora (and Mastadon) and found them all subpar for my needs. But of course if Discord works well for you and your friends, that's great!
Anyway I hope you continue to share your thoughts and experiences on this line of thinking and your experiments to bring more of this into your life!